Wine Trade Winds Diary for January 2006
MONDAY, JANUARY 16, 2006

by Dean Tudor
Member of The Wine Writers Circle of Canada




For the actual results of this tasting, please follow this link.

The Time and Date: Monday, January 16, 2006, at 6 PM
The Event: Canada versus Bordeaux, at the monthly meeting of the Ontario Wine Society.
The Venue: Ontario Club
The Target Audience: It was a sold-out audience of some 140 members of the OWS, wine press, and agents.

The Availability/Catalogue: tasting notes and sheets. This blind tasting of wines from Ontario, BC, and Bordeaux (with a ringer) is modeled on a series of professional tastings organized over the years by Larry Paterson, formerly of the LCBO and currently a grape grower and winemaker. Since 1996, he has organized 16 Ontario/BC/Bordeaux tastings. The results are at www.littlefatwino.com.

The Quote: Tony Aspler was the speaker-analysis for the evening. One of his comments was about the theory of continental drifting, which referred to the fact that many wines were seemingly mid-Atlantic in style despite their geographic origin.

The Wines: we tasted them blind, and we all voted on what we thought were the best wines, in order.

First place: New Zealand Newton Forrest Cornerstone 2002 Cabernet Sauvignon ($42.75, from Abcon International). I thought the wine was neither BC nor Ontario. It was the ringer, and I suspected Washington State. I preferred it "second".

Second place: Ontario Stoney Ridge 2002 Founders Cabernet Merlot Signature ($34.95). A good nose convinced me of its Bordeaux nature. I preferred this wine as "first".

Third place: British Columbia Sumac Ridge 2001 Pinnacle ($50).I thought the wine was disjointed, and I did not place it anywhere geographically. It had 3% syrah, so I thought it was a bit of a cheat for Bordeaux (unless you look at historical records when Bordeaux used a lot of syrah from the Rhone).

Fourth: Ontario Colio 2002 CEV Reserve Merlot ($24.95).The style of this wine leaned to more Cabernet edge than Merlot, but I still thought it was Ontario.

Fifth: Ontario Southbrook Winery Triomphe 1999 ($39.95). I thought that this wine was very French: Bill Redelmeier tries for that style. I placed it "third".

Sixth: BC Mission Hill 2001 Oculus ($50). A bit weak in the nose.

Seventh: Bordeaux Chateau L'Hospital Veyret Latour 2002 ($27.95). Iodine and sharp fruit in the nose, definitely French.

Eighth: Bordeaux Chateau Segonzac 2000 ($32.95). Woody, good length. I place the wine "fourth".

Ninth: Ontario Lakeview Cellars 1998 Cabernet Sauvignon ($25). Thick, soft and sweet, aging nicely.

Tenth: Bordeaux Chateau Puyfromage 2003 ($13.65), flat nose and surprisingly unfruity despite the 2003 vintage. A poor bottle?

The Food: snack of reasonable food.

The Effectiveness (numerical grade): 90.

www.littlefatwino.com