Is there a bias to the # of listings, domestic vs imported, at the LCBO?
It seems reasonable to assume that when the Liquor Control Board of Ontario provides domestic wines with a higher percentage of the number of Wine General Listings (those wines available to all stores) than is justified by the percentage of sales it could be claimed that they were "Cheating" on behalf of the home team. Nobody in their right mind could ever claim that the LCBO ever cheats on behalf of the locals in Vintages, in the Classics Catalogue, or in Consignment products. Look at the following numbers, and remember that 1% of wine sales at LCBO is now worth about $12 million...
YEAR % of General List % of Sales by Litre Domestic %
that was Domestic that was Domestic over Import
2006 27.8 29.9 - 2.1
2005 27.5 30.6 - 2.1
2004 27.7 30.2 - 2.5
2003 28.3 31.0 - 2.7
2002 29.1 31.1 - 2.0
2001 31.0 30.8 + 0.2
2000 31.0 31.8 - 0.8
1999 33.1 32.8 + 0.3
1998 35.0 34.2 + 0.8
1997 36.2 34.1 + 2.1
1996 35.6 31.8 + 3.8
1995 34.2 30.6 + 3.6
1994 34.5 31.8 + 2.7
1993 35.1 33.4 + 1.7
1992 37.6 36.0 + 1.6
1991 39.9 35.1 + 4.8
1990 37.9 36.4 + 1.5
1989 41.1 40.4 + 0.7
1988 42.5 43.0 - 0.5
1987 43.6 41.1 + 2.5
1986 46.6 40.9 + 5.7
Notice how the percentage of listings that are domestic is, over time, decreasing even faster than the decrease in sales of domestic wine? Is there some plausible reason for this??? Remember that the General List is the only portion of LCBO wine sales that remotely approximates availability of domestic products with actual sales. If non-general list sales were excluded, it would make the above results seem much worse, and would probably show a 20 year picture of lower support than sales would justify. Clearly the last few years are dismal for Canadian wine producers, and the farmers that they purchase their grapes from.
JUST WHO ARE THEY "CHEATING" FOR NOW? AND WHY??